Wired Journalists

A Publish2 network

here's a video I shot and helped edit yesterday. Please critique.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WgVPhOSeliA

Share

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I don't have experience with online video or video at all (hence why I'm in this group). Still, here are my thoughts:

-The speaker you had at the end was great.

-Good video editing and mix of singers, speakers, and different groups.

-I wish there had been some narration to set things up.

Reply to This

I have just a couple of comments to make here besides the fact that I think you did a good job of gathering decent sound with a variety of people and also a good job of shooting the people on the stage as well as the crowd.

First, you need to get your hands on a tripod. The video would have been way better shot the way it was, but with a tripod. Huge difference.

Second, try not to zoom very much... I know its hard, but it will keep the viewer from thinking about the production of the video and focused on the story that you are showing them. If you have to zoom do it really slowly... crawl up to the tight shot or from it.

Experience will make you a better video journalist... the two tips I just gave you came to mind right away because I broke both of them today while shooting a house fire. While driving home tonight I just had to keep telling myself that the important thing was that I could look back and see the mistakes I made, I just have to remember them for the next time.

Reply to This

Tripod, as Mike Deal suggested. Especially if you are zoomed in every movement is amplified and it interferes with the story telling. Also if you need to zoom in, physically move in. In other words don't use the zoom controls on your camera it is too distracting. I think it would have been great, if possible to get some comments from some of the people attending the service.

Reply to This

A few things to note about tripods and zooming:

Think of each frame as an image. The bigger the difference between one frame to the next, the larger your file size.

The harder you compress your video, the more these differences between frames really matter, because they'll result in poorer quality and lots of pixelization.

Stabilize the frame and let the action happen within it rather than creating movement with the frame. You'll save your self tons of headache when editing too.

Reply to This

Thanks,

The effort was hurt by my failure to get more generic crowd reaction that I could have used to interrupt the zooming, I think. In other words, medium range shot of preacher, overlay his audio on crowd shot, back to close up.

Does something like that work?

As for the tripod, is it simply a stability issue or is there some other aspect to it? And how do you shoot an action scene (like a fire) with a tripod?

Reply to This

Every situation is different (so don't take this too literally) but find a point in the center of the action at the fire.

Point the camera at some action in front of you, like the fire. Shoot wide, medium and tight shots for at least 10 seconds each. Turn the camera on action to your left or right and shoot wide, medium and tight shots of people standing around or the trucks. Then do the same behind you.

Then go get your sound bites.

Try not to shoot too much, especially in situations where the video is most valuable immediately. More video means more hassle in editing.

Four angles times 3 shots each gives you 12 different edits to work with. You can start out with a head of someone talking about the fire, cover the sound with multiple shots of the fire, then end with a second person talking about it.

That doesn't mean shouldn't take your camera off your sticks at some point. Just make sure that you hold it steady (if it's a small camera hold it close to your chest. If it's large, get it on your shoulders).

Reply to This

Thanks for that thoughtful analysis (and to all the others as well).

The reason I chose to shoot video is I couldn't think of any reason to write a story, quoting people talking about what MLK means to them, because that story's been written about 47 million times. I was to cover the day, though, and I was relying on the video to make this story different - the music , the fiery preacher, etc.

I'm not sure what someone could have said about MLK in an interview that woulda been compelling. Do you think a slicker video would have obviated that?

I get what you're saying about lingering shots

Reply to This

RSS

About

Ryan Sholin Ryan Sholin created this social network on Ning.

Create your own social network!

Find out more

Wired Journalists is a Publish2 network.

Follow WiredJ on Twitter!

Badge

Loading…

© 2009   Created by Ryan Sholin on Ning.   Create Your Own Social Network

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service

Publish2 powers collaborative journalism.

Sign in to chat!