After Howard Owens spoke to last week's Storytelling Innovations seminar at API, I decided to give Twitter a more serious try. It's a social networking platform I had not understood yet. Not sure I do yet, but I wrote this column about it: http://www.americanpressinstitute.org/pages/resources/2008/01/ready...
And now I'm Twittering occasionally for the next week. Not sure I get it yet, but I'll be writing more about it soon. I'm interested to hear whether you've used it and what your experience has been.
After I posted this question, I joined the group "New to Social Networks" and found a good discussion on Twitter that was helpful to me and probably will be to you, too.
I've been twittering since August and I find it very interesting. It sometimes works for me like a mini-blog for when you want to refer what you're doing but you're not really inspired or don't really have the time to write a long post.
It's funny how I've even heard about some news from Twitterers before even seeing them on tv or newspapers. I'm very interesting in the possibilities of twitter as a tool for reporters.
I'm going to follow your experience on twitter (I'm twentysth there). Lets see what conclusions you'll come to. :)
I'm a huge proponent of Twitter, Steve. Try using a desktop client, such as Twirl or Twitterlicious and you'll enter a new world of Tweeting. I put up a guide to Twitter tools and resources on my blog, may have you some items to check out: http://www.newmediabytes.com/2008/01/18/best-twitter-tools-resource...
Okay... so maybe it could be useful for politics. What about other things that we report on on a daily basis such as crime, corruption and scandal. What's the difference between using Twitter in the courtroom or blogging from the courtroom? Is it the aggregation?
The majority of the stuff I see on Twitter is useless information about where someone is going or what they are doing. If my audience is mainly people on their computer at work, I feel like I would turn them off with so much useless information.